The choice makers at Assured Fee Area/Sox Park are being roundly criticized for not declaring an “lively shooter” scenario and telling attendees to go away the park.
I feel these in cost made the correct resolution. A mass exodus of tens of hundreds of followers would have been chaos. Individuals wouldn’t have carried out it in an orderly vogue. Many would have been trampled, and the casualties would have been quite a few.
Think about if there have been an “lively shooter” outdoors the park. With so many individuals leaving the venue, a shooter with an AK-47 may have mowed down anybody inside vary.
SEND LETTERS TO: letters@suntimes.com. We wish to hear from our readers. To be thought-about for publication, letters should embody your full title, your neighborhood or hometown and a cellphone quantity for verification functions. Letters ought to be a most of roughly 375 phrases.
I feel the Sox administration acted responsibly. The issue will not be with these in cost at Sox Park. The issue is with the convenience of entry not solely to extraordinary weapons however computerized weapons that ship bullets out like water from a backyard hose.
The 2nd Modification was handed at a time when it required a number of minutes to reload a gun. There was no standing military, so troopers took their weapons dwelling with them.
Weapons are fairly totally different now. Computerized weapons ought to be banned. Weapons which might be authorized should be carefully regulated and licensed, and people with psychological issues shouldn’t be allowed to have them.
We should take into account the rights of extraordinary People to stay and transfer in a protected setting, free from the concern of being shot with a purposeful or random bullet.
Freedom from concern and freedom to stay ought to overtake the liberty to personal and use a gun.
Karen Wagner, Rolling Meadows
Republicans calling out Biden’s age want to talk up about McConnell’s well being
For the second time in weeks, Senate Minority Chief Mitch McConnell froze and blanked out, staring straight forward, incapable of constant to reply questions throughout a press convention.
Medical specialists would probably name them “ischemic assaults,” i.e., passing neurological disconnects quickly stopping regular psychological functioning, precursors of worse to return, unhappy to say.
But, though Republicans usually harp on President Joe Biden’s age, 80, although he exhibits no signal of faltering, they’re silent about McConnell’s blank-outs at age 81.
When a referee in a prize battle sees a boxer, nonetheless on his ft however knocked so foolish he can’t defend himself, he ends the battle. There are not any referees in Washington, so it’s as much as McConnell’s fellow Republicans to counsel McConnell to move the baton to subsequent in line for the speakership.
Will it’s one of many extra considerate Republicans, or one among their mouthy radicals we may all title if requested? That second of reality is upon them. And if nothing else, we’re witnessing the fact that age alone will not be the disqualifier that Republicans attempt to impose on Biden. Efficiency decides.
McConnell is flunking that take a look at, whereas Biden exhibits no comparable signs. Winner: Biden. Case closed, till and until Biden begins blanking out like McConnell.
Ted Z. Manuel, Hyde Park
